Bra Science: How Band Size Changes with Cup Size - Cleo by Panache

Just when  you thought bra fitting couldn't get any more complicated, it turns out that a 30 often isn't the same as a 30.

It's commonly known that people with larger cup sizes tend to choose smaller bands over those with smaller cup sizes. But is this an organic decision or influenced by changing band lengths with cup sizes?

I collected Bratabase data on the stretched and unstretched band lengths in a couple of band sizes of Cleo bras - the ones with the most data. The results were pretty interesting!

Line chart showing Cleo's stretched band lengths in D-J cups in 28, 30 and 32 bands

The title is self-explanatory - this chart details Cleo's stretched band lengths.

As you can see, from D-G the bands are fairly consistent. The 28s stretch to just a little over 28", the 30s stretch to a little over 30", and the 32s hover around a little over 32". All seems to be pretty normal.

But then we reach the GG. The G to GG jump is known to be a place where lots of brands change scaling, cup construction and other aspects of a bra. The stretched band lengths change by about 1.3cm. That's quite a lot!

H cups are pretty similar to GG, but again we see a jump from H to HH of about 1.5cm. This makes a HH Cleo fit about 2.8cm longer in the band than a G cup Cleo - well over an inch. That's a huge discrepancy!

But why is this? Well we have another data point at our disposal: the unstretched band lengths.

Line chart showing Cleo's unstretched band lengths in D-J cups in 28, 30 and 32 bands

As you can see, the trends are somewhat mirrored but not to the same extent. Yes, there are the classic jumps from G to GG and from H to HH, but overall the unstretched lengths have slightly less variation in their band lengths to the stretched bands.

So what else can you do with two sets of data? Take them away from each other, of course!

Line chart showing the differene between Cleo's stretched and unstretched band lengths in D-J cups in 28, 30 and 32 bands

As you can see, the larger bands stretch more. That totally makes sense - more band fabric leads to more overall stretch.

You can also see the H to HH jump clearly, but the G to GG jump is much less pronounced - if it is there at all.

Larger cup sizes have less band material than smaller ones (as more of the bra is taken up by cup), so you'd expect the bands to get less stretchy with increased cup size, but clearly they get more stretchy. So why?

And why the jumps with size in the other charts too?

I have some theories as to why we're seeing the data that we're seeing:

  • Changes to patterns at key sizes
I think this is the number one reason we're getting such pronounced shifts in band length. You can't just take one bra size and scale it up, you'll run into problems. So companies start with a few base sizes and adjust from there - clearly GGs are quite different to Gs and HHs are different to Hs.
  • Certain styles only being made in certain size range
Cleo sells up to a J cup, but none of their padded styles go past an H. However, this wouldn't account for the difference between G and GG cups - I'm not aware of any Cleo styles that top out at a G. Also, their padded styles often run a bit looser in the band to their unpadded styles (compare the likes of Cleo Juna or Maddie to Cleo Marcie, Lucy or Hettie). So this wouldn't seem to explain the data we're seeing here.
  • Longer wires taking less force to pull outwards while measuring a stretched band
Larger cups have longer wires. Those of you who studied physics at school know that the turning moment on a fulcrum is proportional to the distance from the fulcrum. ie You can make a wire bend more with the same force if it's longer. This could potentially account for a gradual increase in band length. However, I don't know how the various parts of a bra affect this, and of course we're not seeing gradual increases here but big jumps.

  • Different cup sizes using different materials
This is an untested theory. We know that many brands reinforce the cups of their bras after GG cups (Cleo Hettie is an example of this), and some add three rows of hooks after certain cup sizes (though Cleo doesn't). But are other aspects of the bra being changed too? It seems counterintuitive to have a stretchier bra in larger cups what with a generally greater need for support, but it may be happening. Particularly as Cleo's HH cups seem to be much stretchier in the band than H cups.

  • Different sizes potentially being made in different places
Another completely untested theory. I don't know a huge amount about the process of industrially manufacturing bras, but this could be a possibility. Maybe the place that's making the G and GG cups just tends to make the bands that little bit longer? I don't know. It sounds a little implausible but I'm just trying to brainstorm all possibilities here.

  • User error and differences in measuring for different sizes on Bratabase
Maybe people who wear J cups really give their bras more of a tug than those who wear D cups? It's a possibility. Maybe they each try  to simulate the force their bras will be under, and since people with larger cups generally have heavier breasts, they stretch their bras more when measuring. Again, this would account for a gradual increase in stretched band lengths but not the jumps we see here. Also, this would not affect unstretched band lengths - even though we see clear differences with cup size and unstretched band lengths.

I also would like to point out that I chose sizes with lots of data - each data point has a minimum of around 50 bras listed in that size (I am aware that that's not fully representative of measurements taken), and most had well over 100 bras listed.

I understand that there are big limitations with this data. Different bra lines stop at different sizes, and bras themselves vary hugely in band lengths from cut to cut. However this data is still useful in realising that clearly there are drastic differences in band size with changes in cup size, and we should bear this in mind when recommending bras to others or trying bras for ourselves.

Have you experienced issues with crossing the size jumps in Cleo bras? Let me know!

And who knows, if people like these posts I'll do other brands in the future :)


  1. Anonymous08 June, 2017

    This is interesting, it explains why I wear a 32 when my measurements suggest a 34, I am about an M cup, explains why with my smaller​ friends why they prefer a slightly larger band size to their measurements.

  2. I'm wondering if anyone else has had trouble with Panache sizes lately. They used to be sized U.K. separate from U.S., but recently the sizes are combined. My Idina tag now says "UK/US" and it's significantly smaller than when it was just UK. I don't want to have to do trial and error buy/try/return again to find my new size, but it seems like there are no new charts for the combined size. I'm all measured up with no size to buy. Any input?

    1. While they may have redesigned the bras separately, I don't believe the label change was accompanied by any structural changes. My advice is to always go by the size listed as where the company is from as bra companies in general aren't great at converting sizes.


Post a Comment