Bra Science: How Band Size Changes with Cup Size - Cleo by Panache
Just when you thought bra fitting couldn't get any more complicated, it turns out that a 30 often isn't the same as a 30.
It's commonly known that people with larger cup sizes tend to choose smaller bands over those with smaller cup sizes. But is this an organic decision or influenced by changing band lengths with cup sizes?
I collected Bratabase data on the stretched and unstretched band lengths in a couple of band sizes of Cleo bras - the ones with the most data. The results were pretty interesting!
The title is self-explanatory - this chart details Cleo's stretched band lengths.
As you can see, from D-G the bands are fairly consistent. The 28s stretch to just a little over 28", the 30s stretch to a little over 30", and the 32s hover around a little over 32". All seems to be pretty normal.
But then we reach the GG. The G to GG jump is known to be a place where lots of brands change scaling, cup construction and other aspects of a bra. The stretched band lengths change by about 1.3cm. That's quite a lot!
H cups are pretty similar to GG, but again we see a jump from H to HH of about 1.5cm. This makes a HH Cleo fit about 2.8cm longer in the band than a G cup Cleo - well over an inch. That's a huge discrepancy!
But why is this? Well we have another data point at our disposal: the unstretched band lengths.
As you can see, the trends are somewhat mirrored but not to the same extent. Yes, there are the classic jumps from G to GG and from H to HH, but overall the unstretched lengths have slightly less variation in their band lengths to the stretched bands.
So what else can you do with two sets of data? Take them away from each other, of course!
As you can see, the larger bands stretch more. That totally makes sense - more band fabric leads to more overall stretch.
You can also see the H to HH jump clearly, but the G to GG jump is much less pronounced - if it is there at all.
Larger cup sizes have less band material than smaller ones (as more of the bra is taken up by cup), so you'd expect the bands to get less stretchy with increased cup size, but clearly they get more stretchy. So why?
And why the jumps with size in the other charts too?
I have some theories as to why we're seeing the data that we're seeing:
- Changes to patterns at key sizes
- Certain styles only being made in certain size range
- Longer wires taking less force to pull outwards while measuring a stretched band
- Different cup sizes using different materials
This is an untested theory. We know that many brands reinforce the cups of their bras after GG cups (Cleo Hettie is an example of this), and some add three rows of hooks after certain cup sizes (though Cleo doesn't). But are other aspects of the bra being changed too? It seems counterintuitive to have a stretchier bra in larger cups what with a generally greater need for support, but it may be happening. Particularly as Cleo's HH cups seem to be much stretchier in the band than H cups.
- Different sizes potentially being made in different places
Another completely untested theory. I don't know a huge amount about the process of industrially manufacturing bras, but this could be a possibility. Maybe the place that's making the G and GG cups just tends to make the bands that little bit longer? I don't know. It sounds a little implausible but I'm just trying to brainstorm all possibilities here.
- User error and differences in measuring for different sizes on Bratabase
I also would like to point out that I chose sizes with lots of data - each data point has a minimum of around 50 bras listed in that size (I am aware that that's not fully representative of measurements taken), and most had well over 100 bras listed.
I understand that there are big limitations with this data. Different bra lines stop at different sizes, and bras themselves vary hugely in band lengths from cut to cut. However this data is still useful in realising that clearly there are drastic differences in band size with changes in cup size, and we should bear this in mind when recommending bras to others or trying bras for ourselves.
Have you experienced issues with crossing the size jumps in Cleo bras? Let me know!
And who knows, if people like these posts I'll do other brands in the future :)
This is interesting, it explains why I wear a 32 when my measurements suggest a 34, I am about an M cup, explains why with my smaller friends why they prefer a slightly larger band size to their measurements.
ReplyDeleteI'm wondering if anyone else has had trouble with Panache sizes lately. They used to be sized U.K. separate from U.S., but recently the sizes are combined. My Idina tag now says "UK/US" and it's significantly smaller than when it was just UK. I don't want to have to do trial and error buy/try/return again to find my new size, but it seems like there are no new charts for the combined size. I'm all measured up with no size to buy. Any input?
ReplyDeleteWhile they may have redesigned the bras separately, I don't believe the label change was accompanied by any structural changes. My advice is to always go by the size listed as where the company is from as bra companies in general aren't great at converting sizes.
Delete